![]() ![]() I don't think it's something to argue about, and whoever is actually involved in the mod gets the say over how it ends up, and the one with the idea gets the most leeway. ![]() For the Imperials, you play off of how Elisif is a pawn for the Thalmor by proxy. I could see the imperials (not mostly Nords, so not as easily motivated by your status as Dragonborn) banding behind a couple different leaders, the one which comes to mind the quickest would be a powerful leader (the Dragonborn who already has the support of at least one Jarl) who disapproves of the Thalmor (like Ulfric) but otherwise strongly supports the Empire (very much unlike Ulfric).įor the Stormcloaks, you play off of how dislikable he is. The stormcloaks (mostly Nords) could easily be rallied behind a Dragonborn who openly disapproves of the way the stormcloaks are acting and their leader's actions and behavior. The different sides would, of course, need a different approach because they're starting with different motives. How about from a prospective mod user's point of view? If I were playing a mod which allowed me to raise an army and take the throne, I'd be much happier if I could do it from either side. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |